Featured Articles

AMD sheds light on stacked DRAM APUs

AMD sheds light on stacked DRAM APUs

AMD is fast tracking stacked DRAM deployment and a new presentation leaked by the company  points to APUs with stacked DRAM,…

More...
Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

As expected and reported earlier, Nvidia has now officially announced its newest Shield device, the new 8-inch Shield Tablet. While the…

More...
Intel launches new mobile Haswell and Bay Trail parts

Intel launches new mobile Haswell and Bay Trail parts

Intel has introduced seven new Haswell mobile parts and four Bay Trail SoC chips, but most of them are merely clock…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
AMD A8-7600 Kaveri APU reviewed

AMD A8-7600 Kaveri APU reviewed

Today we'll take a closer look at AMD's A8-7600 APU Kaveri APU, more specifically we'll examine the GPU performance you can…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 17 June 2013 11:09

Man who stopped Microsoft dies

Written by Nick Farrell



Thomas Jackson ended Redmond’s monopoly

The man who arguably did more to stop the rise of Microsoft than any other mortal has died. Thomas Penfield Jackson, a federal judge who ruled in 2000 that Microsoft was a predatory monopoly and must be split in half. For one moment the world stopped spinning and Microsoft looked completely doomed.

However he saw an appeals court reverse his order because he had improperly discussed it with journalists, but from then on it was all downhill for Microsoft. Judge Jackson, who served in the District of Columbia, stopped the anti-trust action dragging on for decades by limiting each side to 12 witnesses and forced lawyers to submit testimony in writing. The main court proceedings took 76 trial days.

A technology luddite, Jackson refuted Microsoft’s assertion that it was impossible to remove the company’s Internet Explorer Web browser from its operating system by doing it himself. When a Microsoft lawyer complained that too many excerpts from Bill Gates’s videotaped deposition famously punctuated with the phrase “I don’t remember” were shown in the courtroom, Judge Jackson pointed out that the problem is with the witness, not the way his testimony is being presented.

Jackson fell down because he gave too many interviews with journalists during the trial and, after it ended. To be fair they were great quotes. But when Redmond went to appeal they were his undoing. A year later, the Court of Appeals in Washington said Judge Jackson’s comments gave the impression of bias, removed him from the case and vacated his order to divide Microsoft.

But the Appeals court let stand much of his April 2000 ruling that Microsoft was a monopoly because he had written that before most of the interviews. That was the end of Microsoft's case and it was a very different Redmond which evolved in the aftermath. The appeals court sent the case to another federal district judge, Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, to sort things out. By then George W. Bush was in and was not going to demand the break-up of any successful business. In the end there was a negotiated a settlement in 2002.

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments