Featured Articles

Intel refreshes CPU roadmap

Intel refreshes CPU roadmap

Intel has revealed an update to its CPU roadmap and some things have changed in 2015 and beyond. Let’s start with the…

More...
Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

We broke the news of Nvidia's ambitious gaming tablet plans back in May and now the Shield tablet got a bit…

More...
Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia has announced its first Android tablet and when we say Nokia, we don’t mean Microsoft. The Nokia N1 was designed…

More...
Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell is better known for its storage controllers, but the company doesn’t want to give up on the smartphone and…

More...
Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia recently released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture, with exceptional performance-per-watt. The Geforce GTX 970…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 17 June 2013 11:09

Man who stopped Microsoft dies

Written by Nick Farrell



Thomas Jackson ended Redmond’s monopoly

The man who arguably did more to stop the rise of Microsoft than any other mortal has died. Thomas Penfield Jackson, a federal judge who ruled in 2000 that Microsoft was a predatory monopoly and must be split in half. For one moment the world stopped spinning and Microsoft looked completely doomed.

However he saw an appeals court reverse his order because he had improperly discussed it with journalists, but from then on it was all downhill for Microsoft. Judge Jackson, who served in the District of Columbia, stopped the anti-trust action dragging on for decades by limiting each side to 12 witnesses and forced lawyers to submit testimony in writing. The main court proceedings took 76 trial days.

A technology luddite, Jackson refuted Microsoft’s assertion that it was impossible to remove the company’s Internet Explorer Web browser from its operating system by doing it himself. When a Microsoft lawyer complained that too many excerpts from Bill Gates’s videotaped deposition famously punctuated with the phrase “I don’t remember” were shown in the courtroom, Judge Jackson pointed out that the problem is with the witness, not the way his testimony is being presented.

Jackson fell down because he gave too many interviews with journalists during the trial and, after it ended. To be fair they were great quotes. But when Redmond went to appeal they were his undoing. A year later, the Court of Appeals in Washington said Judge Jackson’s comments gave the impression of bias, removed him from the case and vacated his order to divide Microsoft.

But the Appeals court let stand much of his April 2000 ruling that Microsoft was a monopoly because he had written that before most of the interviews. That was the end of Microsoft's case and it was a very different Redmond which evolved in the aftermath. The appeals court sent the case to another federal district judge, Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, to sort things out. By then George W. Bush was in and was not going to demand the break-up of any successful business. In the end there was a negotiated a settlement in 2002.

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments